The following mechanisms, to assist in the evaluation of the pupil had been selelcionados in the present work:

    Tool of consensus: based in the Delphi technique, it is intended to assemble an environment, saw Internet, where
    professor will be able to present a instigadora question, and through the responses and posterior thread of the pupils
    on the ranks, to get, of organized form, the best definitions. This is a way to classify
    pupils, not only for providing the considered responses better, as for the participation in this type of
    mechanism;
    Tracking: the register of each pacing that is given by the pupil (page whom it had access, it dates and hour) is important therefore
    it allows the professor to monitor the progress of the pupil in the course. The collected information, will have to be presented
    of form that professor can have the accurate notion of the course of the course, in that he refers to the way with that the pupil
    he has participated of the course, thus showing that type of access the pupil has made (visited units, tools
    used, etc), as well as the time expense with the access of these;
    Control of the stream of information: so that the communication tools that more are had access currently
    (e-mail, rooms of chat and list of quarrel) they can be used in an evaluation process, them
    its use, this with regard to amount and quality must have registered referring information of
    changed information. For the email job, for example, the register of the number of bytes transferred, number of
    received messages sent and, etc. For the rooms of chat, it can be had some rooms, or some moments
    specific, where all changed information is registered, keeping the author of each idea. For the stack of
    quarrel can be had registered all perguntas/respostas given by the pupils;
    Tool of voting: looking for to supply a tool, where the professor will be able to get one feedback fast
    of the pupils on determined subject, searching the reaction of the pupil to whom it comes being presented, and where through
    of these ranks the professor will be able to review the form to present the course. Also he will be through this that the pupil
    he will make its auto-evaluation.

It is important to stand out in the identification of these components for the evaluation, what he presents yourself is not a structure
alternative but yes to complement to the scene of tests and works of dim of course that has been normally used in
long-distance education

The considered work will describe a form of implantation of this proposal.